Instagram and LinkedIn Add Tagging

Facebook is adding Hashtags. LinkedIn has added @tagging and now Instagram has followed suit. It seems the largest social networks are paying attention to the preferred features on Twitter and are incorporating them in a terrific show of follow-the-leader.

Here is the skinny:  In an update to their mobile apps, Instagram has added Facebook-like tagging to uploaded images. They are calling the feature Photos Of You.

To get started, grab the update and then open Instagram and upload a new image. Apply whatever filters you want and then proceed to the description and sharing screen. You’ll see  a new button to Add People. Tap that and you will go back to a screen displaying your image, only this time you can tap specific areas of the image and choose to tag that area with someone’s name, just like on Facebook. Once you’re finished, you can add a caption, map it, and choose to share to Facebook, Email, Twitter, Tumblr, Flickror Foursquare, just as before.

Tag, you're it! Instagram adds People Tagging

You can drag tags around and tap to remove them. Note that in order to tag someone, you need to search using their username. Hopefully Instagram will improve this feature to be more user friendly, as it would be more natural to search by name.

Once you save your image, it will appear within the Instagram feed with a small person icon in the lower left corner that you can tap to see tags.

Also note that all Instagram users are initially set to Automatically have tagged photos added to your profile. If you want to approve photos first, go to your profile and tap on the new Photos Of You icon, then tap the settings icon in the upper right. I’m sure many will be upset that Instagram has chosen to make this setting automatic rather than manual by default, and that the setting is buried within your photo gallery and not with other app settings and options.

The udpate is available for both iOS and Android users.

Screen shot 2013-05-03 at 11.50.19 AMMeanwhile, LinkedIn now lets you @mention companies and connections as the site continues to place a greater emphasis on followers and influencers.

I’ve also heard that Klout is (finally) going to start leveraging more of the activity and influence found on LinkedIn into their algorithm.

Social Media and Healthcare Trends and Behaviors

 

New Game From Angry Birds Creators

Rovio Entertainment, the creators of Angry Birds is launching a new mobile game called Amazing Alex.

The title is a rebranding of Casey’s Contraptions, which Rovio bought from developers Noel Llopis and Miguel A. Friginal earlier this month. Rovio CEO Mikael Hed told Mashable that the latest game “has an educational element and centers on the main character Alex, a curious young boy who loves to build things.” The title is expected to be released within the next two months.

As the video below demonstrates, Casey’s Contraptions is another physics-based game along the lines ofAngry Birds. The game features Rube Goldberg-type contraptions that are made from items like balloons, soccer balls, scissors and buckets.

Rovio announced the billionth download of Angry Birds last week. The company, which released the game in 2009, offers four different versions of the game — Angry Birds Space is the latest. In addition, Rovio is working on a movie, TV show and theme park based on the property.

The Evolution of Social Media – A Look Back and Ahead

As you know, I’ve just rebranded and relocated from Blogger to WP. While organizing my old posts dating back to 2007, it was fun to see how brand engagement has completely transformed over the years.

So, whadaya say we hop in the ol’ DeLorean, kick it to 88mph and take a look at the evolution of social media.

BLOGGER VERSUS REPORTER

In 2007 and 2008, much of the conversation was heated with bloggers and reporters going at each other.

The general consensus was that bloggers were lonely losers living in their mom’s basements … but all of that was about to change as blogger and social media content began to impact media coverage.

As brands adjusted to the idea of citizen journalism, some wanted absolutely nothing to do with bloggers, much to their detriment. Remember in 2008 when Target told a blogger to buzz off? Or, when Mark Cuban kicked a blogger out of the Maverick’s locker room? Oh, how far we’ve come!

Of course, while we debated whether Bloggers were or were not “real” journalists in 2008, we were also creating laws to protect them and their sources.

As we finally accepted that bloggers were here to stay toward the end of ’08, we started debating whether or not they would replace traditional media; a discussion, by the way, that continued as we began to see a decline in investigative journalism and a rise in social media players and bloggers breaking big stories. (Remember the first photo of Captain Sully’s heroic splash down came not from an intrepid reporter on the scene, but from a random guy on Twitter.)

Soon, brands starting getting in on the action and leveraging their own blogs in interesting ways. And, even Congress got in the game on YouTube.

VIRAL TAKES OVER

With acceptance of social media came the campaigns in ’08 and soon “viral” was the word du jour with everyone scrambling to get that precious link passed around.

The results varied from incredibly successful and absolutely beautiful to truly incomprehensible and downright inconceivable.

In fact, we became so obsessed with and entertained by viral videos that some smart marketers from Mini made our obsession their campaign.

SOCIAL BLUNDERS

As social media campaigns became more important throughout 2008, clients began demanding the skill-set from agencies and marketing budgets began to shift to digital.

Of course, in the rush to deliver, some agencies and brands had very public blunders. Who could forget Motrin’s moronic mistake of insulting the very women they were trying to reach, which gave rise to the power of mommy bloggers everywhere.

And, the mistakes continued into 2009 as brands tried to make their products hip and “web 2.0″ – remember Kraft’s iSnack? They sure hope you don’t.

Even into 2010, as two-way engagement in social media channels became all the rage, some brands just couldn’t get it right. Remember how Nestle’s Facebook rep argued with and insulted consumers online? I still can’t believe how that one went down.

SOCIAL MEDIA SUCCESSES

Of course, some brands really did get it right. Dove’s viral film, for example.

And, BofA stopped a potential thief from brandjacking – and stealing your money – through Twitter.

And, of course, social media got it’s biggest push to the mainstream with the digitally-driven election of our first “social media President.”

At this point, social media adoption reached unfathomable levels as social networking became more popular than porn in terms of online activities.

PRIVACY TAKES PRECEDENT

Similarly, by 2009, privacy became the next word du jour as we saw more and more people losing their jobs over what they said in social media.

Some even lost the job before they really started. Who remembers the Cisco Fatty debacle? I’ve often wondered what happened to that girl. If you know, give me a shout.

This became such an issue that by 2001, the government began passing legislation protecting free speech on social media sites and guaranteeing that your employer would have to find another reason to fire you after you dissed him online.

SOCIAL MEDIA DEATHS

These past five years also saw some tragic losses and most of us learned about them through social media; from one of the original creators of public relations to the man who created the soundtrack of my youth and whose death nearly killed the Internet along with him.

And, of course, more recently, the man who delivered social media to our fingertips through his incredible creations and whose demise caused Twitter to fail three times in less than an hour.

SOCIAL GOES MOBILE

By 2010, the new flavor was apps. No matter what you wanted to do, there was an app for that. The healthcare industry, prodded by the FCC, led the way. And, soon after, even our cars were getting in on the craze.

Online gaming apps also transformed brand engagement as did non-gaming apps.

And, next came Social TV.

After some failed attempts – remember back in 07 when CNN created a virtual newsroom in Second Life – we started seeing some interesting innovations from MTV and Facebook.

And, I genuinely believe we are just at the tipping point today of this next (r)evolution to our digital consumption and engagement. So, I say, let’s get back to the future and dive in with our minds open and our hearts free to let the fun begin … again!

HAPPENING NOW: Prime Minister David Cameron To Ban Social Media To Quell Riots

When you think of a government shutting down social media to quell rioting in the streets, Britain is not the first country that comes to mind. But, about an hour ago, Britain’s Prime Minister David Cameron told parliament that the government is going to ban UK citizens from popular social networking sites if they are suspected of plotting criminal activity. No explanation of what constitutes suspicion has been released at this time.

As I reported earlier, Blackberry’s BBM and Twitter have played a huge role in fanning the flames unrest in London, with rioters hacking into BlackBerry’s Twitter account and making threats against the company if the it cooperates with police. (BlackBerry BBM’s are encrypted and therefore enable mass communication that cannot be monitored by police).

Cameron said he would meet with Facebok and Twitter to discuss whether it is possible to limit the spread on online messages in connection with acts of rioting, looting or other criminal activity.

And, social media isn’t the only thing Cameron is after, he is also requesting that broadcasters hand over unused footage to police in connection with the riots in order to identify criminals, which has been vehemently protested when attempted previously.

Of the riots in connection to social media, the Prime Minister said:

Everyone watching these horrific actions will be struck by how they were organised via social media. Free flow of information can be used for good. But it can also be used for ill. And when people are using social media for violence we need to stop them. So we are working with the police, the intelligence services and industry to look at whether it would be right to stop people communicating via these websites and services when we know they are plotting violence, disorder and criminality. I have also asked the police if they need any other new powers. Police were facing a new circumstance where rioters were using the BlackBerry Messenger service, a closed network, to organise riots. We’ve got to examine that and work out how to get ahead of them.

Cameron however, has said he will do “whatever it takes” to bring order to the nation after the acts of civil disobediance. Police are already taking action against rioters and have arrested three people in Southhampton under suspicions or inciting violence through Twitter and BBM.

I understand the inclination to ban social media sites and shut down people’s phones. I mean, things are insane in London and now, many other cities. I cannot believe the images that are still coming out of this mess and its heartbreaking to see a city I love so much being destroyed.

But, even if you ignore the morality issues connected to shutting off people’s phones and access to social media and the big brother issues and the democratic nation \ free press issues, it’s still been proven that banning social media doesn’t work. Egypt tried and apart from costing Egypt’s economy as much as $90 million, or $18 million per day, it did nothing to quell the protests.

What do you think? Is it possible to ban social media? Is it even possible to police it? We’re talking about private corporations and the freedom of the press. On the other hand, what would you do if your city was burning?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 14,700 other followers

%d bloggers like this: